| |
| |
May 1, 2008
Today, in the United States, states have created usury laws in order to set a maximum legal interest rate limit. Because Congress has chosen not to regulate interest rates on a national level, individual states have made the decision to to protect their consumers. Unfortunately, the usury cap is still at a very questionable rate and in the last twenty or so years it has only risen. In the state of Michigan, the usury rate is currently 25%. Which begs the question, why have interest rates been allowed to soar to such outrageous amounts?
More... |
| |
January 28, 2008
As it stands now, Chapter 13 bankruptcy is the most effective tool in saving your home from foreclosure. It allows you to get caught up, while freeing you from other debt you may have. However, there is a call to allow bankruptcy judges to help even more. Jack Kemp, the former secretary of Housing and Development, recently wrote an opinion for the Los Angeles Times. In it, he outlines changes that could make Chapter 13 bankruptcy more helpful to homeowner ’s and the economy in general.
More... |
|
| |
|
Student Loans and Bankruptcy |
Consumer Bankruptcy
Student Loans General
Rule
Student loans, generally, are not dischargeable
under any chapter of the Bankruptcy Code.
A Bankruptcy can, however, eliminate other debts
that are competing for your dollars and provide
a measure of peace during a Chapter
13 plan. Further, in a Chapter
13, some courts permit the debtor to separately
classify a student loan so that a greater percentage
of disposable income goes to the student loan
than non-secured debt.
Exception
There is an extremely narrow exception
to student loans. The borrower would
have to show "undue hardship."
This determination is for a judge to
rule, but is usually made by a combination
of factors.
Factors for "Undue Hardship"
Those who file bankruptcies in Michigan are
subject to the laws as they are interpreted
in the Ninth Circuit. The Ninth Circuit follows
the test for undue hardship set forth in the
cases of In re Brunner, In re Shankwiler and
In re Pena. Those cases state that in order
to demonstrate hardship for purposes of discharging
a student loan, three criterion must be met:
(1) the debtor must prove that he/she cannot
maintain a minimal standard of living if forced
to repay the student loans, based upon current
income and expenses; (2) that additional circumstances
exist indicating that this state of affairs
is likely to persist for a significant portion
of the repayment period; and (3) that the debtor
made a good faith effort to repay the loans.
The court is required to exercise its discretion
in determining whether and undue hardship does
in fact exist.
First the courts will look to the net monthly
income and subtract out reasonable monthly expenses.
Then it will look to see whether the debtor
profited in the work force by his education
and whether the debtors earning potential was
increased by the education.
Lastly the court will look to see what efforts
the debtor made to repay the loans, and whether
the debtor had requested a deferment or not.
The inquiry is guided by the idea that the debtor's
bad financial condition and default should not
have been caused by the debtor's own willfulness
or negligence, but rather by factors beyond
the debtors control. Each case will of course
turn on its own facts and it will be incumbent
upon the debtor's attorney to convince the court
that "undue hardship" does in fact
exist in the debtor's case.
Bottom line: your student loans probably aren't
going away in a bankruptcy, but at least you'll
better be able to afford them.
|
|
| |
|
|