Second Start Bankruptcy Attorneys who relieve more than just debt 1-800-SAVEDME
ABOUT SECOND START     |     FILING BANKRUPTCY     |     BANKRUPTCY EVALUATION    |     BANKRUPTCY BLOG     |     CONTACT
 
 


Michigan Bankruptcy
Stop Foreclosure
Debt Consolidation
Firm Overview
Free Bankruptcy Evaluation
Bankruptcy Blog
News and Articles
F.A.Q.
Contact Us

 
 
 

May 1, 2008

Interest Rates, State Usury Laws, and the Federal Government: What Went Wrong?
Today, in the United States, states have created usury laws in order to set a maximum legal interest rate limit. Because Congress has chosen not to regulate interest rates on a national level, individual states have made the decision to to protect their consumers. Unfortunately, the usury cap is still at a very questionable rate and in the last twenty or so years it has only risen. In the state of Michigan, the usury rate is currently 25%. Which begs the question, why have interest rates been allowed to soar to such outrageous amounts?

More...

 

January 28, 2008

Bankruptcy Can Help Even More
As it stands now, Chapter 13 bankruptcy is the most effective tool in saving your home from foreclosure. It allows you to get caught up, while freeing you from other debt you may have. However, there is a call to allow bankruptcy judges to help even more. Jack Kemp, the former secretary of Housing and Development, recently wrote an opinion for the Los Angeles Times. In it, he outlines changes that could make Chapter 13 bankruptcy more helpful to homeowner ’s and the economy in general.

More...

 
Bankruptcy Attorneys Sanctioned

This is a continuation of the United States Trustee's report of sanctions against people who have helped (or not) people seeking bankruptcy help.

$300 Attorney Fees Disgorged
Judge Jury granted the UST's motion for disgorgement of fees in the amount of $300 from attorney Stanley M. Becker. Becker failed to represent debtors David and Karen Langehennig in defending the UST's Section 707 dismissal motion and failed to request relief as counsel of record, compelling debtors to represent themselves or face dismissal of their case. Judge Jury reasoned that Becker was obligated to take affirmative action in his representation of the debtors and failed to do so.

Discipline Panel Revokes Right to Practice
Judges Peter Carroll, Jury and Naugle referred attorney Susan Jordan to the U.S.B.C.'s Discipline Panel based upon her continued failure to pay Court-ordered fee disgorgement's and fines. On December 3, 2003, the Discipline Panel revoked Jordan's right to practice before any bankruptcy judge in the District based upon her violation of legal and ethical responsibilities. The Panel stated that her refusal to follow court orders was endemic and she had made no attempt to carry out her duties as an officer of the Court. Bankruptcy attorneys sanctionedThe Discipline Order provides that it will be forwarded to the United States District Court and to the State Bar of Michigan. Jordan appealed the order and made an application for stay pending the Appeal. The stay was denied.

Attorney Ordered to Disgorge Fees and to Appear at his § 341(a) Meetings
Judge Erithe A. Smith of the Michigan Division of the Court granted the UST's motion for disgorgement of fees and ordered attorney David Marh to return $500 to a debtor and to personally appear with his clients at the § 341(a) meeting of creditors. The Order resulted from the debtor appearing at two §341(a) meetings with the same appearance attorney. No creditors were scheduled on the debtor's bankruptcy papers (except the IRS with zero dollars owing). The statement of financial affairs was incomplete and the IRS was listed on the mailing matrix with an incorrect address. At both meetings, the chapter 7 trustee asked the debtor why the bankruptcy was filed. Neither the debtor nor the appearance attorney offered an explanation. Judge Smith granted the UST's separate motion to dismiss the case under § 707(a).

Attorney Agrees to Discipline and Disgorge
A UST investigation revealed that attorney Bernal P. Ojeda failed to meet with or consult with his clients in 17 cases. Ojeda then initiated discussions that culminated in his stipulating to return all fees in the 17 cases in the total amount of $15,450 and to have the matters referred to the Court's Discipline Panel. Ojeda admitted that he did not adequately supervise his staff with regards to the interview of the debtors, the preparation of debtors' petitions and other bankruptcy documents.

Attorney Agrees to 30 Month Voluntary Suspension and Sale of Practice
Claudia L. Phillips agreed to not engage in the practice of bankruptcy law in the Central District for 30 months. Phillips, who had one of the largest consumer bankruptcy practices in the country, filing over 1,200 petitions in 2002, also agreed to sell her bankruptcy practice. Call one of our expert bankruptcies attorneys today.  Toll free at 1-800-SAVEDMEPhillips had earlier been referred to the Court's Discipline Panel by Judge Ernest M. Robles of the Michigan Division of the Court. Judge Robles issued findings of fact and conclusions of law that Phillips and the other attorneys in her office failed to provide legal services to a debtor and failed to meet with the debtor prior to filing debtor's petition. Judge Robles found that Phillips' non-attorney husband, Ken Phillips, provided legal advice to the debtor and concluded that Claudia Phillips aided in the unauthorized practice of law, failed to adequately supervise the work of non-attorneys, and failed to perform legal services with competence. Other inappropriate conduct cited by Judge Robles included: failure to meet with and consult with clients; failure to abide by Court orders; improper solicitation of client, and allowing a staff member to sign the debtor's name, as well as Phillips' name, on bankruptcy documents. The Discipline Panel approved a Stipulation in Lieu of Discipline on January 16, 2004.


 
 
 
  National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys   BBB Seal   American Bankruptcy Institute
 
click for a free bankruptcy evaluation

All Rights Reserved 2008.

Legal Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Site Map | Add our Link | Email Webmaster

This is a DEBT RELIEF AGENCY.  We help people file for relief under title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.

This may be considered an advertisement or advertising material under the Rules of Professional Conduct. This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client professional relationship.